FROM THE EDITOR
IS A PROUD MEMBER OF: nBUILDINGS
Jesse H. Neal Award
Jesse H. Neal Award
2014, 2013, 2012,
2011, 2010, 2009
Best Publication and
Best How-to Article
BUILDINGS SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION RATES:
United States and its possessions: $120.00 for 1 year.
All foreign countries $150.00 (US funds) (surface
mail) for 1 year. Extra and back issue copies (when
available) are $10.00 each, shipping and handling
included – except on large/bulk shipments. Tear
sheets $1.75 each. All orders must be PREPAID
to: BUILDINGS magazine, 615 Fifth St SE, Cedar
Rapids IA 52401 or PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids IA
52406-1888. Attn: Subscription Department. 1-800-
553-8878 ext. 5020.
Copyright 2016 Stamats Communications.
For high-quality, customized
reprints, please contact
Stamats Marketing Services:
1-800-553-8878 ext. 5034
The Stamats headquarters
is a LEED Certified Silver
Volume 110 Number 7 BUILDINGS (ISSN 0007-3725) is published monthly by Stamats Communications 615 5th St. SE, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888; (319)
364-6167. Periodicals Postage Paid at Cedar Rapids, IA, and at additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: Buildings, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-
1888. Publications mail agreement No. 41666041. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: PO Box 875, STN A, Windsor, ON, N9A 6P2.
A Publication of Stamats Buildings Media
Group Publisher Tony Dellamaria
Chief Content Director Chris Olson
Senior Editor Janelle Penny
Senior Editor Jennie Morton
Art Director Elisa Geneser
Senior Graphic Designer Evan Brownfield
For subscriptions, visit:
Buildings is a registered trademark owned by
Editorial Advisory Board
Christopher K. Ahoy President/CEO,
Performance Management Consulting
Steven R. Colvin Senior Vice President of
Property Management, Boston Properties LP
Michael Delev General Property Manager, Hines
Rod Stevens Principal Consultant,
Eric A. Woodroof Founder,
What Has Green
Readers of BUILDINGS publications have long reported high interest in articles on green certification, and the editorial staff has delivered them. This issue, for example, has an article on the GreenCircle program (page 15) as well as an article on Sustainable SITES (page 18).
But how many building owners and facility managers have actually achieved green certification for a building? And has green certification significantly reduced the environmental impacts of
Those are some of the questions that Jerry Yudelson poses in a new book, Reinventing Green
Building: Why Certification Systems Aren’t Working and What We Can Do About It. Yudelson
focuses primarily on LEED, which, he argues, has not made enough inroads into the
buildings industry and market, particularly among building owners. LEED is a niche prod-
uct that serves only a small building segment – primarily high-end office developments.
Successive LEED versions only make an ever smaller segment “jump higher and higher”
while having little impact on most of the population, especially the vast existing building
stock. Hefty certification costs deter many, as do the volume of required documentation
and arbitrary rulings on variances. The expansive point system leads to strategies that
earn points, but not necessarily to those that best lessen environmental impacts (a situa-
tion that reminds me of teachers who bemoan a requirement to teach to narrow standardized tests
rather than to education). Building owners need something that better meets business needs.
Yudelson’s solution is green building rating systems that focus only on five key performance
indicators – energy use, total carbon emissions, water use, waste minimization and ecological purchasing. Other systems would handle issues like green urban design, healthy buildings for occupants and green building materials.
I think BUILDINGS readers would agree with many of Yudelson’s arguments (although my summary of them here is necessarily short). I’ve heard many anecdotes about high certification costs,
dubious scorecard points and an onerously complex system. Nevertheless, the breadth of LEED
and the UK’s BREEAM systems, both of which were pioneers, was needed when the full range of
environmental impacts and priorities was not as well-known as it is now. More recent certification
systems, like GreenCircle and SITES, tend to have narrower scopes.
Simple systems scale more easily. I wonder what the overall environmental impact would be if
modest green practices were adopted by a vastly larger number of buildings rather than a high bar
met by a few.
Let me know what you think.
Chief Content Director