FROM THE EDITOR
IS A PROUD MEMBER OF: nBUILDINGS
Jesse H. Neal Award
Jesse H. Neal Award
2014, 2013, 2012,
2011, 2010, 2009
Best Publication and
Best How-to Article
BUILDINGS SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION RATES:
United States and its possessions: $70 for 1 year;
Canada, $85 (U. S. funds) for 1 year; all other foreign
countries, $125 surface mail for 1 year; $150 air mail
for one year. Extra and back copies (when available):
$8.00 each, shipping and handling included. Tear
sheets: $1.75 each. All orders must be PREPAID to:
BUILDINGS magazine, 615 Fifth St. SE, PO Box 1888,
Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888. ATTN: Barb Schrafel,
800/553-8878, ext. 5017.
Copyright 2014 Stamats Communications.
For high-quality, customized
reprints, please contact
Stamats Marketing Services:
1-800-553-8878 ext. 5034
The Stamats headquarters
is a LEED Certified Silver
Volume 109 Number 7 BUILDINGS (ISSN 0007-3725) is published monthly by Stamats Communications 615 5th St. SE, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888;
(319) 364-6167. Periodicals Postage Paid at Cedar Rapids, IA, and at additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: Buildings, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA,
52406-1888. Publications mail agreement No. 41666041. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: PO Box 875, STN A, Windsor, ON, N9A 6P2.
A Publication of Stamats Buildings Media
VP, Group Publisher Tony Dellamaria
Chief Content Director Chris Olson
Senior Editor Janelle Penny
Senior Editor Jennie Morton
E-Content Editor Pete Campie
Art Director Elisa Geneser
Graphic Designer Evan Brownfield
For subscriptions, visit:
Buildings is a registered trademark owned by
Editorial Advisory Board
Christopher K. Ahoy President/CEO,
Performance Management Consulting
Steven R. Colvin Senior Vice President of
Property Management, Boston Properties LP
Michael Delev General Property Manager, Hines
Steve Fugarazzo Manager, Facilities Engineering,
Rod Stevens Principal Consultant,
Eric A. Woodroof Founder,
The Wild West of Renewables
Disruptive innovation” has become an overused buzzword in recent years – like when a Kellogg executive called a new Pop-Tart flavor a disruptive innovation – but the word
certainly applies to renewable energy and on-site generation. Their impact on the electrical
utilities and consumers has created a Wild West of regulations.
Utilities make a profit by selling electricity. It’s a simple concept we all understand – the
more utilities sell, the more they make. The problem is the possible disincentive that situation creates for conservation. On the other hand, new technology allows consumers and
building owners to generate their own power and, in many states, utilities are required
to purchase any excess from the consumer as determined by net metering. This creates
a vicious cycle in which distributed generation and efficiency measures decrease utility
revenues, which requires rate increases to maintain the grid and profitability, which further
incentivizes users to develop their own generation, leading to more lost revenues.
In some states, new “decoupling” regulations are designed to provide other incentives (
reliability, service, performance) to utilities so they can saddle up and ride efficiency hard without
fear of losing their own horse flesh. “True-up” programs in some areas allow utilities and users
to use net metering to settle up periodically. The utilities’ cost to provide power in a given
period determines the rate they can charge consumers as well as the rate they pay consumers
for their excess power.
As one can easily imagine, agreement on how to tally up on such horse trading is no easy
undertaking. The various policies across states, utilities, and regulators are as numerous as
were roaming buffalo back in the day. And they can change rapidly.
Take Wisconsin, for example, where the Public Service Commission decided this year that
the true-up period should switch from a monthly to an annual basis. This change to the formula, some say, reduces the incentive for users to invest in on-site solar because they will be
compensated significantly less for their excess during the fall and spring months. Meanwhile,
users in net metered markets who don’t or can’t afford solar installations complain that they
pay higher rates because of those who can get off the grid.
I’m sure that, in time, a new model will emerge for the power industry. In the meantime, it
behooves building owners considering on-site renewable energy to know which way the wind
is blowing on these matters in their neck of the country.
If you think you’re riding ahead of the renewable herd, take a look back every now and then
to make sure it’s still there.
Chief Content Director