FROM THE EDITOR
IS A PROUD MEMBER OF: nBUILDINGS
Jesse H. Neal Award
Jesse H. Neal Award
2014, 2013, 2012,
2011, 2010, 2009
Best Publication and
Best How-to Article
BUILDINGS SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION RATES:
United States and its possessions: $70 for 1 year;
Canada, $85 (U. S. funds) for 1 year; all other foreign
countries, $125 surface mail for 1 year; $150 air mail
for one year. Extra and back copies (when available):
$8.00 each, shipping and handling included. Tear
sheets: $1.75 each. All orders must be PREPAID to:
BUILDINGS magazine, 615 Fifth St. SE, PO Box 1888,
Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888. ATTN: Barb Schrafel,
800/553-8878, ext. 5017.
Copyright 2014 Stamats Communications.
For high-quality, customized
reprints, please contact
Stamats Marketing Services:
1-800-553-8878 ext. 5034
The Stamats headquarters
is a LEED Certified Silver
Volume 108 Number 12 BUILDINGS (ISSN 0007-3725) is published monthly by Stamats Communications 615 5th St. SE, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888;
(319) 364-6167. Periodicals Postage Paid at Cedar Rapids, IA, and at additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: Buildings, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA,
52406-1888. Publications mail agreement No. 41666041. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: PO Box 875, STN A, Windsor, ON, N9A 6P2.
A Publication of Stamats Buildings Media
VP, Group Publisher Tony Dellamaria
Chief Content Director Chris Olson
Senior Editor Janelle Penny
Senior Editor Jennie Morton
E-Content Editor Pete Campie
Art Director Elisa Geneser
Graphic Designer Evan Brownfield
For subscriptions, visit:
Buildings is a registered trademark owned by
Editorial Advisory Board
Christopher K. Ahoy President/CEO,
Performance Management Consulting
Steven R. Colvin Senior Vice President of
Property Management, Boston Properties LP
Michael Delev General Property Manager, Hines
Steve Fugarazzo Manager, Facilities Engineering,
Rod Stevens Principal Consultant,
Eric A. Woodroof Founder,
Can the Federal Government
Play a Role in Energy
The answer to that question isn’t easy, not merely because the issues are complex but because they are mired in politics.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005, popularly known as EPAct, authorized a green-technology
loan program that became a political flashpoint due to the failure of Solyndra, a manufacturer of distinctive thin-film solar cells wrapped around lightweight cylinders. (It should be
remembered that EPAct included many provisions, including rebates of up to $1.80/square
foot for energy efficiency improvements in commercial buildings, a program that extended
through 2013.) Solyndra received $535 million in federal green-tech loans.
After Solyndra went bust, it was reported that company officers had received huge
bonuses just before the end. There were also reports that the company had attempted to
disguise its sagging financial situation and the actual performance of its products. The FBI
began an investigation, as did congressional Republicans.
To date, Solyndra has not been put on trial for any charges. Of course, that doesn’t
mean that the firm is innocent or guilty. But in the political wars, Solyndra came to
represent the entire green-tech loan program.
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz has announced that a revamped loan program is open for
business, and last month the DOE issued a performance report on the Loan Programs Office
(LPO). Through September 2014, loans and loan guarantees totaled $30.29 billion. The loss
rate as a percentage of funds disbursed is 3.59% and the loss rate for total commitments is
2.28%. LPO-financed projects have returned $3.5 billion in principal and $810 million in interest
to the Treasury.
Some opponents of the loan program argue that, as a matter of principle, government should
not be involved in using taxpayer funds for such purposes. That’s a position that can certainly
be supported, but opponents can’t argue that Solyndra represents the entire loan program. They
also can’t ignore the fact that the federal government supplies billions in loans, subsidies and
guarantees to the oil and gas industry and many others, not to mention small businesses.
In the meantime, the buildings industry needs cost-effective alternative energy. Innovation
takes time – and money – to develop; bringing new technology to viable commercial products
often takes more of both.
Chief Content Director