Jesse H. Neal Award
Jesse H. Neal Award
2014, 2013, 2012,
2011, 2010, 2009
Best Publication and
Best How-to Article
BUILDINGS SUBSCRIP TION INFORMATION RATES:
United States and its possessions: $120.00 for
1 year. All foreign countries $150.00 (US funds)
(surface mail) for 1 year. Extra and back issue
copies (when available) are $10.00 each, shipping
and handling included – except on large/bulk
shipments. Tear sheets $1.75 each. All orders must
be PREPAID to: BUILDINGS magazine, 615 Fifth
St SE, Cedar Rapids IA 52401 or PO Box 1888,
Cedar Rapids IA 52406-1888. Attn: Subscription
Department. 1-800-553-8878 ext. 5020.
Copyright 2016 Stamats Communications.
For high-quality, customized reprints,
please contact Stamats Marketing Services:
1-800-553-8878 ext. 5034
The Stamats headquarters
is a LEED Certified Silver
IS A PROUD MEMBER OF: nBUILDINGS
Volume 111 Number 4 BUILDINGS (ISSN 0007-3725) is published monthly by Stamats Communications 615 5th St. SE, PO Box 1888, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888;
(319) 364-6167. Periodicals Postage Paid at Cedar Rapids, IA, and at additional mailing office. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: Buildings, PO Box 1888,
Cedar Rapids, IA, 52406-1888. Publications mail agreement No. 41666041. Return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: PO Box 875, STN A, Windsor, ON, N9A 6P2.
A Publication of Stamats Buildings Media
Group Publisher Tony Dellamaria
Chief Content Director Chris Olson
Senior Editor Janelle Penny
Assistant Editor Justin Feit
E-Content Editor Keith Evanson
Art Director Elisa Geneser
Senior Graphic Designer Evan Brownfield
For subscriptions, visit:
Buildings is a registered trademark owned by
Editorial Advisory Board
Christopher K. Ahoy President/CEO,
Performance Management Consulting
Steven R. Colvin Senior Vice President of
Property Management, Boston Properties LP
Michael Delev General Property Manager, Hines
Rod Stevens Principal Consultant,
Eric A. Woodroof Founder,
Avoiding a Loss or Seizing a Gain:
Which Drives You?
FROM the EDITOR
Imagine you are approached by a person who says he can
show you how to avoid wasting $100 each month on your
energy bill. Then imagine you are approached by another
person who says she can show you how to save $200 each
month on your energy bill.
Will you find one offer more attractive than the other?
Many behavioral economists believe that you are far more likely to be persuaded by the
first offer. The decision is motivated by the concept of loss aversion. Most people are far more
averse to losing something than they are attracted to a windfall gain. From a psychological
point of view, losses are twice as powerful as gains. It is similar to having a bird in the hand
rather than two in the bush. So if a proposition is framed as avoiding waste or loss of resources,
we may be more motivated to act than if we are promised something that we see as a windfall,
even if the latter is twice as large.
Of course the hypothetical situation above doesn’t supply nearly enough information to tell
us whether it is smarter to take the $100 or the $200 offer. An FM would need to evaluate the
specifics of each person’s solution. But we know that the fear of loss is something that many
marketers and politicians exploit adroitly, and that many building owners are loath to make
investments in energy retrofits, despite the prospect of future savings.
I first read about the loss aversion principle in a book entitled Thinking Fast and Slow by
Nobel Prize-winning economist Daniel Kahneman. But I had been aware for years of a kind of
confirmation of the principle, one that all editors know — that you, dear readers, are drawn
more to articles with titles that pose a threat (Stop losing energy!) than to those that present a
possible gain (Save big energy bucks!). Readership surveys consistently show that the former
get a larger response — about twice as much.
Most of us probably need to push back against our innate tendency to avoid perceived loss.
After all, no one wants to be known as the kind of person who is so loss averse that he/she
Chief Content Director